Mike Chaney's Tech Corner
June 26, 2017, 02:59:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Feb 2013: Qimage Ultimate Challenges... have fun and explore features!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Download and develop photos from your flash cards with one click!
Get a trial of
FlashPipe today and stop fumbling with explorer windows to transfer photos and videos
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 400 mm lens; been a while!  (Read 32544 times)
Fred A
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4343



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 16, 2013, 06:15:05 AM »

It has been some time since I pulled out the 400mm lens to take a few shots.
A number of years ago, I bought the 400mm Canon "L" Prime lens,  F 5.6.
I bought it because I am one of those nutz that likes SHARP images.  I don't really care for "pretty sharp" or acceptable, not too bad...
I like sharp lenses.
As you know, some are, and some are not, and some are only sharp at certain F stops.
I have one of those too, a 28-135 (not an L lens) that is soft until I stop down to 6.3 to 8.0.
I love that lens, but not wider than F 6.3.

I have a couple more; a 17-40 "L", very sharp, and a 70-200 "L" not so sharp, and the old old, 50mm, very sharp.

But let's get back to the 400 that I pulled out of my bag again.
I have a good tripod, and a very good head, and..... I use a CABLE RELEASE with this lens.
"A Cable release?   Yepper!
I am either a klutz, or heavy handed. I am not sure which, but the snap of the shutter button when I shoot will soften the shot.

Got this one the other day... not sharpened, right out of the camera except for a crop.

Just wanted to share lens stories, and hope you will share some back.
Remember to click on the images to enlarge.

Fred
Logged
Fred A
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4343



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2013, 06:20:08 AM »

Here's another two shots with that 400mm.
These were shot at about 100 feet from the subject.

Fred
« Last Edit: December 16, 2013, 06:31:53 AM by Fred A » Logged
Jeff
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 632



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2013, 10:23:34 AM »

A couple of years ago I got a Sigma DC 17-70mm macro HSM

I did a rather crude test at various apertures and F'lenghts and was not all that impressed with the results at the 17 and 70 range and F3.5 and F32

Took some shots in the Tate Gallery last week in the range  17mm f3.5 30th 400iso (lowish light hand held) and they are noisy and not sharp enough.

That effort and you have spurred me on to do a better test.

jeff



 
Logged

Grumpy
Jeff
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 632



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2014, 11:21:43 AM »

Just started to analyse a test series.

I mounted a standard eye test chart,  a graph paper layout and a black and off white line drawing of a suspension bridge on a display board.

Camera on tripod and set it to aperture priority at 100 isp, Raw + top quality jpg. using a radio trigger,  Set up in lounge in the shade on a bright sunny day.

Found the .jpgs difficult to judge and after wasting a lot of time trying to crop the board only and get all on one big image all to no avail.  Fell back on to good old Ultimate, and used the raws (having set raw format options to no sharpening and no noise reduction and taking all at the resulting default)  and the image comparator - two at a time, and found that with the lens at 17mm  F8 is the best, could only make a proper judgement on the Eye test sheets and Bridge.

Now got to evaluate the lens at other focal lengths then repeat for my other two lenses.

Quite a performance but well worth the knowledge.

Jeff


 
 
Logged

Grumpy
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!