Mike Chaney's Tech Corner
March 28, 2024, 11:58:13 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Qimage registration expired? New lifetime licenses are only $59.99!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Professional Photo Printing Software for Windows
Print with
Qimage and see what you've been missing!
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: v2014.211 issues/comments  (Read 14590 times)
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4109



View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2014, 12:16:31 AM »

We have 17.  21 only gives you 4 extra steps and those will be spread out over the entire range.  So if we're talking blacks, that's the bottom 25% of the range (at most).  So you might get one extra step in the range you are working if it was 21 instead of the existing 17.  You really can't make that work?  It is, after all, a smoothed curve.  Meaning that you can move the point just before or just after the missing single entry you have in the 21 step curve and the "missing" step will move accordingly.  If you have a curve so jagged down in that range that you need a curve that looks that erratic, you probably need to solve the underlying problem that is causing the jagged tone curve at the source.

Mike
« Last Edit: April 27, 2014, 12:20:58 AM by admin » Logged
Mack
Full Member
***
Posts: 224


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2014, 02:23:10 AM »

Thanks Mike.  We're on the same page at least on the LOC numbers (0-16).

If there was an easy way to call in the 21 steps to the LOC to make it linear it would be great.  As it is, the spreadsheets that do this L*ab linearization stuff automatically take some step, like step 19 that goes off the straight line where all the others are dead on.  Then I have to try and figure out that gray scale step 19 (if it is towards the white end) a LOC 14 or 15 in Qimage's LOC's box?  It's really 14.48 if my math is right, but I cannot plug that in to the LOC as the scale is too small and fixed on whole numbers both.

If I could set say LOC=14.5 that would work, although takes me some math to get from that step tablet number of 19 into Qimage.  As it is, Qimage rounds down to 14 and it messes up that number which was correct based off the spectrometer's readings so that part of the curve now gets messed up when it was correct.  For piezo inks, it becomes a mess since it pulls in another gray ink tank out of 8-9 tanks.

Actually, even on a 51 step scale, if the linearization spreadsheet says step 49 is off, if I could plug in 15.4 into Qimage that would work even with the 0-16 current range in it now.  Problem with the 51 steps if a range of say 44-49 is off, then how to null it out without using a finer scale in the LOC axis range?

Some of these black inks are very finicky in the Qimage Curves I find as they also call in other colors to make them neutral.  That fading blot of Keith Cooper's newest B&W Test Image sure shows up banding if the tuning curve isn't spot on.

Aside, QuadToneRip (QTR) doesn't work well in newest Windows and Roy seems to have abandoned it to Apple/Mac as his Windows coder never updated his compilers for newer Window versions.  It allows for a lot of curve tuning in blacks and colors of ink, I think it did more than 51 steps and maybe more as it pulled in the spectrometer readings and adjusted the curve automatically.  Just it crashes a lot in Windows 8 and Roy cannot fix it so it is a very old version now.  Windows needs a new QTR B&W printer software of some sort (hint. hint.  Wink ).

Anyway, food for thought.  0-16 with the ability to set 1.3 (example) would be better for fine tuning with these new 21 & 51 step tablets, just a bit more math work or a spreadsheet formula to correct for entry into Qimage LOC box.

Mack
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4109



View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2014, 06:31:37 PM »

Well, assuming the 21 step scale goes from 0-20, here's some math that will get you pretty close:

P (uppercase) = 17 step
p (lowercase) = 21 step

As you can see, 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the 17 step scale align perfectly with values from the 21 step scale.

P0: p0
P1: p1*0.75 + p2*0.25
P2: p2*0.50 + p3*0.50
P3: p3*0.25 + p4*0.75
P4: p5
P5: p6*0.75 + p7*0.25
P6: p7*0.50 + p8*0.50
P7: p8*0.25 + p8*0.75
P8: p10
P9: p11*0.75 + p12*0.25
P10: p12*0.5 + p13*0.5
P11: p13*0.25 + p14*0.75
P12: p15
P13: p16*0.75 + p17*0.25
P14: p17*0.50 + p18*0.50
p15: p18*0.25 + p19*0.75
p16: p20

Example: to get loc 3 on the 17 step scale, take loc 3 on the 21 step scale times 0.25 and add loc 4 on the 21 step scale times 0.75.

Hmm.  Now that I think about it, lemme know if this works.  If so, I could probably build in a 21 step converter feature where you can enter all 21 steps and it'll automatically make the QU 17 point curve for that.

Mike
« Last Edit: April 28, 2014, 06:43:06 PM by admin » Logged
Mack
Full Member
***
Posts: 224


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2014, 12:23:37 AM »

Mike, if I read your math right, the small "p" is off my 21 step chart.  Those are fixed whole numbers so Step 1 is p1, Step 2 is p2 etc. on the X-axis.

If I do the table I get this:

P0: p0                 = 0
P1: p1*0.75 + p2*0.25   = (0.75)+(0.50)  P1=1.25   i.e. (Step 1*0.75) + (Step 2*0.25) for a Qimage LOC # = 1.25   Huh?  Can't input that into QU.  Rounds down to 1 only.
P2: p2*0.50 + p3*0.50   = (1.0)+(1.50)   P2=2.50    Drops down to LOC=2
P3: p3*0.25 + p4*0.75   = (0.75)+(3.00)  P3=3.75   Drops down to LOC=3
P4: p5         =    = P4 or LOC4 = Step 5
P5: p6*0.75 + p7*0.25   = (4.5)+(1.75)    P5=6.25

... etc.

Seems to be dependent on some other step than the single one I want to address, and also altering its neighbor, aside from the decimal part?

Somehow I can't see how 21 'whole numbers' off a step wedge reading can be fitted to 17 'whole number' LOC steps without some sort of decimal in the mix too?

Was trying to do this in a spreadsheet and got a math headache.  Ugh!  Cheesy

______________________

Aside:

I'll attach a sample 21 step wedge (converted) JPG, but I need to reverse the Black to Zero and White to 21 for use in Qmage.  What usually happens with some cheap printers the blacks get bunched up around the 18-21 scale in the JPG.  I think my Canon 9000 II falls into the "cheap" category (Hence the need to do a quick bump off the left side of the Curve in QU as above), and the Epson 3880 addresses the issue a bit better with more balck shades of in.  Tuning the black shadows so they separate in the cheap Canon is a problem, and the i1 spectrometer tells me its blocked up too.  Just cannot refine it as well since the QU LOC range/scale is too compressed.

Don't know why 51 gray scale wedges is some big deal either, but those are out there.  Might be the 8-9 blacks in piezo inks may make the same "bunching up of black shadows" issue with a smaller 3 black inks 'color' printer; Somewhat like Canon 9000 II is to 3-black ink 3880 (Excluding the other Epson 3880 Photo Black or Matte Black since only one can be used at a time, along with the other Light Black and Medium Black.).

Keith Cooper's newest B&W Test Image has the 51 step wedge that is capable of being scanned with the i1 ColorPort software which might make it easier than reading all 51 steps individually.  Should be easier to dump the readings into a CRV file to read in the software or a spreadsheet that shows the linearization curve.  He also did a 21 step as well maybe for manual entry or the cheaper ColorMunki Photo.  Must be some standard since Kodak had 21 step wedge for decades, and Stouffer in the printer biz both.

Mack
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4109



View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2014, 02:46:39 AM »

Mike, if I read your math right, the small "p" is off my 21 step chart.  Those are fixed whole numbers so Step 1 is p1, Step 2 is p2 etc. on the X-axis.

If I do the table I get this:

P0: p0                 = 0
P1: p1*0.75 + p2*0.25   = (0.75)+(0.50)  P1=1.25   i.e. (Step 1*0.75) + (Step 2*0.25) for a Qimage LOC # = 1.25   Huh?  Can't input that into QU.  Rounds down to 1 only.
P2: p2*0.50 + p3*0.50   = (1.0)+(1.50)   P2=2.50    Drops down to LOC=2
P3: p3*0.25 + p4*0.75   = (0.75)+(3.00)  P3=3.75   Drops down to LOC=3
P4: p5         =    = P4 or LOC4 = Step 5
P5: p6*0.75 + p7*0.25   = (4.5)+(1.75)    P5=6.25

... etc.

No.  Capital P is the value on your 17 step curve.  Lower case p is the value on your 21 step curve.  So figure up your 21 step curve and convert to the 17 step curve using the formulas.

If your 21 step curve starts with these values:

p0 = 0
p1 = 12
p2 = 26
p3 = 38
...
p20 = 255

Then the 17 step curve would look like:

P0 = 0     [p0]
P1 = 16     [12*0.75 + 26*0.25]
P2 = 45     [26*0.5 + 36*0.5]
...
P16 = 255

Mike
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Security updates 2022 by ddisoftware, Inc.