Mike Chaney's Tech Corner
November 30, 2021, 12:14:26 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Feb 2013: Qimage Ultimate Challenges... have fun and explore features!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Professional Photo Printing for Windows
Print with
Qimage and see what you've been missing!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Gamut and color space  (Read 7073 times)
Seth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 322



View Profile
« on: August 01, 2009, 08:32:08 PM »

Hi Terry-

To continue.  I agree with you about gamut.  However, the starting color space is relevant.  Your Perceptual vs. Relative Colorimetric example is made (I am guessing) using Adobe RGB.  Using the premise that you are starting with RAW files.

Instead of re-inventing the wheel, I'll just quote Uwe at Outback Photo:
He also states starting with 16-bit ProPhoto space has a wider initial gamut and is more likened to paper spaces.

"Here we have a situation that we can utilize all the paper colors from ProPhoto RGB. Colors that are outside the paper gamut need to be mapped using a "perceptual" rendering intent. If the colors of your photo mostly are in the the range of the paper you can also use the "relative colorimetric" rendering intent."

The full article is http://www.outbackphoto.com/color_management/cm_06/essay.html.

Also, check this:  http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/prophoto-rgb.shtml.  The same issue.

The problem (?!?!) begins after the camera.  The newer stuff (Nikon, Canon, etc.) have a larger space than Adobe RGB.  (The only camera options for JPGs are Adobe or sRGB though, since they are 8-bit to begin with.)

Since I drag RAW files into ACR, then work them in PS, I watch the out-of-gamut warning on colors that are critical.
Logged

Seth
<CWO4 (FMF) USN, Ret.>
Terry-M
The Honourable Metric Mann
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3213



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2009, 08:40:08 PM »

Quote
Colors that are outside the paper gamut need to be mapped using a "perceptual" rendering intent.
I would agree with that; compressed OoG colours would seem better than clipped ones.

Quote
If the colors of your photo mostly are in the the range of the paper you can also use the "relative colorimetric" rendering intent."
Yes, but  .... if the colours are mostly within gamut, why bother with RC intent, Perceptual rendering will not change them.
That's my take on it.
Terry.
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3411



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2009, 03:20:28 PM »

Yes, but  .... if the colours are mostly within gamut, why bother with RC intent, Perceptual rendering will not change them.
That's my take on it.
Terry.

Perceptual actually does change the colors in and out of gamut.  Perceptual extent "compresses" the gamut of the image so that more of it will fit.  This has the effect of changing both in gamut and out of gamut colors and generally desaturates a bit.  Relative Colorimetric doesn't do that.  It renders all in-gamut colors correctly while just clipping the out of gamut colors to the closest in gamut color.  This fact (about the non-relative "squeeze" effect of perceptual intent) is something most people don't realize or talk about but it is an important concept to understand.

Mike
Logged
Terry-M
The Honourable Metric Mann
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3213



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2009, 03:28:35 PM »

Quote
Perceptual actually does change the colors in and out of gamut.
and
Quote
most people don't realize or talk about but it is an important concept to understand.
Thanks Mike, just shows some of us still have a way to go on understanding colour management.
I'll be seeing the guy who supplied those diagrams in September (http://ddisoftware.com/tech/qimage/red-prints-orange/15/)
 I'll speak to him about it - in the nicest possible way of course.  Wink
Terry.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 03:30:29 PM by Terry-M » Logged
wingspar
Newbie
*
Posts: 31



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2009, 04:34:34 PM »

Perceptual actually does change the colors in and out of gamut.  Perceptual extent "compresses" the gamut of the image so that more of it will fit.  This has the effect of changing both in gamut and out of gamut colors and generally desaturates a bit.  Relative Colorimetric doesn't do that.  It renders all in-gamut colors correctly while just clipping the out of gamut colors to the closest in gamut color.  This fact (about the non-relative "squeeze" effect of perceptual intent) is something most people don't realize or talk about but it is an important concept to understand.

Iím not going to pretend I understand anything about gamut or Perceptual, and Relative Colorimetric, but Iím beginning to learn something I really know nothing about, or at least learn a tad bit about the subject of gamut, Perceptual, and Relative Colorimetric.  In reading your post, I wonder why Perceptual is the (Default) in Qimage, and not Relative Colorimetric?  It almost sounds like it should be the other way around.
Logged

Gary
Will Fly for Food
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!