| admin | 
								|  | «  on: June 30, 2009, 05:08:07 PM » |  | 
 
 
July 2009: dSLR Video Revisited
 Background 
        In January I wrote an
        
        article about the video capabilities being offered on a handful of 
        dSLR cameras.  In the 6 months since publishing that article, 
        Nikon, Canon, and Panasonic have released new dSLR cameras offering high 
        definition video capabilities and with each model, those capabilities 
        get more and more refined.  It seems clear at this point that HD 
        video has graduated from being a nice feature to a necessity when buying 
        a newly released dSLR.  But many are still wondering as they did 
        six months ago: is it time to retire that old HD camcorder?   The Allure of dSLR Video 
        So what's the big deal 
        about dSLR video anyway?  Why would you want to video with a dSLR 
        rather than an HD camcorder?  Simply put, many feel that the larger 
        sensors in dSLR's give a shallow depth of field that looks more like 
        film than video.  Most consumer HD camcorders record video where 
        foreground (subject) and background are in focus at the same time.  
        This deep depth of field has a sort of "video feel" to it.  In 
        contrast, if you are watching a feature film in the theater and you are 
        watching a scene that includes a closeup of some subject, you'll likely 
        notice that the subject is in focus and the background is pleasingly 
        blurred.  The ability to make your subject stand out from the 
        background is something dSLR video can offer that HD camcorders often 
        have a difficult time accomplishing. When dSLR video finally hit the consumer mainstream 
        starting with the Nikon D90 and Canon 5D Mark II, you started seeing 
        shallow depth of field videos from all over the world where people were 
        shooting random scenes and then muting the sound and adding their 
        favorite music (illegally in most cases I might add) for effect.  
        Shooting these shallow DOF "music videos" has become the latest fad, 
        powered by the consumer video capable dSLR.  When tastefully done, 
        it can present an almost larger than life view of certain subject 
        material but more and more it is just becoming a competition to see who 
        can get the most shallow depth of field and add some cool music.  
        In my opinion, there's only so much of that you can watch until it 
        starts to dilute what the depth of field effect is trying to accomplish 
        in the first place.  Hopefully this "shallow depth of field music 
        video fad" will taper off over time and we can get back to using that 
        effect to highlight our subjects rather than oversaturating ourselves to 
        the point that it goes unappreciated or unnoticed when it is truly 
        called for.  While my view is that shallow depth of field 
        videography should be used a little more sparingly than it is in current 
        trends, it is something that dSLR video can accomplish where most 
        camcorders fall short.  Even though it can be overused and abused 
        at times, shallow depth of field when applied to appropriate scenes can 
        promote your videos from video capture to true cinematography!   At a glance: dSLR and dSLR-like cameras that offer 
        video 
        Canon 5D Mark II: As 
        would be expected for a camera of this caliber (and this price range), 
        video quality is exceptional.  With it's full size (35mm) sensor, 
        the 5D Mark II offers the most film-like video quality with shallow 
        depth of field and pristine quality even in low light.  The 5D Mark 
        II is, however, more geared toward the professional videographer as it 
        only offers manual focus while shooting video.  In addition, the 
        built in audio mic sits right above the lens and if you are using an 
        image stabilized (IS) lens, the mic will pick up the noise from the 
        image stabilizer so using an external mic is a requirement if you want 
        to capture hand held video with an IS lens.  This is probably not a 
        good choice if you are looking for a walk around video device. Nikon D90: 
        The first real dSLR to offer HD video, the D90 offers 720p HD video 
        capture but like the 5D Mark II, does not offer continuous autofocus.  
        Audio quality is not as good as the 5D Mark II due to the low sample 
        rate but is usable.  A first generation implementation of HD video 
        in a dSLR, the D90 is an interesting and affordable entry into the field 
        but like the 5D Mark II, will likely not be your choice for a walk 
        around video camera due to lack of automatic controls. Nikon D5000: The second generation Nikon dSLR to 
        offer HD video appears to be an updated dSLR with D90 video added in.  
        Specs are nearly identical to the D90.  Both the D90 and D5000 do 
        well at their mainstay: dSLR photography.  Like the 5D Mark II and 
        D90, the D5000 is a camera that most people will likely use to shoot 
        great photographs, using the video only as an added bonus or for special 
        purposes like creative/staged production work. Canon 500D: The Canon 500D offers full 
        progressive HD quality video (1920 x 1080) but only at 20 frames per 
        second.  For video with even moderate motion or panning, users may 
        prefer the faster 720p mode at 30 fps.  Audio quality is OK using 
        the built in mic but there is no external mic jack on the 500D.  
        Like the 5D Mark II, the internal mic picks up the IS lens noise and 
        autofocus noise so while you can press a button to autofocus while in 
        video mode, the mic will pick up the sound and you'll see an abrupt 
        change in focus in the video and potentially some focus "hunting".  
        Simply put, it's not like the autofocus on your typical HD camcorder. Panasonic GH1: While technically not a dSLR 
        because it has no mirror or optical viewfinder, the GH1 operates much 
        like a dSLR camera and produces similar results.  Due to removal of 
        the mirror which blocks light from the main sensor for functions like 
        autofocus, the GH1 was designed more with video in mind.  Fast 
        autofocus during video and an articulating rear LCD make the GH1 easier 
        to operate.  With stereo microphones built in to the top flash 
        unit, the camera can record good quality sound without interference from 
        autofocus mechanisms or IS lens hardware.  With the 14-140 kit 
        lens, the GH1 also offers a 10x zoom which is comparable to many hand 
        held HD camcorders.  Video compression artifacts render the full 
        (1080) HD mode nearly unusable for anything but slow moving subjects, 
        but the 720p HD modes offer excellent quality.  The Mega OIS 14-140 
        lens also offers image stabilization that appears to be more capable 
        than competing manufacturers as it is designed with video stabilization 
        in mind.  With the Micro Four Thirds sensor being somewhat smaller 
        than the D90, D5000, and 500D APS-C size sensors, the GH1 won't give you 
        depth of field that is quite as shallow as the competitors but certainly 
        better and more film-like than nearly any HD camcorder.   The Big Picture 
        There are some areas where 
        an HD camcorder simply works better than any dSLR.  No current dSLR 
        can compete with the one-handed ease of zooming found on HD camcorders 
        and there are still some technical details yet to be worked out on video 
        capable dSLR cameras.  All of the current dSLR cameras suffer from 
        rolling shutter or "video jello" effects that cause objects to warp or 
        bend during fast panning although the effect is usually not noticeable 
        on anything but ridiculously fast left/right swings: something you don't 
        normally do in video.  In addition, most HD camcorders respond more 
        smoothly to lighting changes whereas the dSLR cameras can sometimes 
        produce a more "stepped" look to lighting/exposure changes.  
        Certainly most if not all yet-to-be-released dSLR cameras will offer HD 
        video in coming months, so expect things to change quickly.  As a 
        non-pro videographer myself, I don't do many staged videos where I can 
        manual focus and shoot from a tripod as would be done in a commercial or 
        short film.  As a result, when compared with your typical hand held 
        camcorders, the current offerings from Nikon and Canon operate more like 
        a "hack" when it comes to video.  They offer shallow depth of field 
        and film-like quality that camcorders cannot accomplish but at the same 
        time they are not very easy to use in the field.  Part of the 
        problem with video on typical dSLR cameras is that with their mirror and 
        prism, they just weren't designed for real time video. The GH1, on the other hand, feels more like a camera 
        that was built from the ground up with video in mind.  Offering 
        super fast and continuous autofocus and an 
        articulating LCD that can be used when holding the camera at odd angles, 
        the GH1 is currently the closest match for replacing your camcorder.  
        That said, don't expect to pick up the GH1 and shoot it like you would a 
        camcorder.  Most camcorders can be operated with one hand even when 
        zooming.  The GH1, with its manual zoom, is a two handed camera and 
        unless you're willing to put in a lot of practice and have a steady 
        hand, you're not likely to see those super smooth zooms you get from an 
        electronic zoom mechanism on a camcorder.  That said, the GH1 is 
        rather forgiving when it comes to large sensor video capture devices.  
        Video quality is not quite up to par with competing camcorders in full 
        1080 HD mode due to the panning and motion artifacts that appear in that 
        mode, but it is possible that future firmware updates will solve that 
        issue and until that time, the 720p video modes work very well on the 
        GH1.  The GH1 also has a size advantage in that it is smaller and 
        easier to carry than its competitors.  For many of us in real world 
        situations, that can mean a greater chance that you'll actually have the 
        camera with you; you can't take photos or video if you left the camera 
        home because you didn't want to deal with the bulk.   
        Summary 
        dSLR video is "the next big 
        thing" in dSLR type cameras.  I see a lot of people upgrading to 
        the next model just to get video, so I want to make sure people are 
        aware of the pros and cons of using certain model cameras as a 
        replacement for an HD camcorder.  As of this writing, the Panasonic 
        GH1 is the only large sensor camera that can be used like an HD 
        camcorder by your average consumer.  There are some new cameras 
        that offer HD video like the Canon SX1 but due to smaller sensor size, 
        they don't really perform like an SLR as far as being able to shoot 
        creative video.  The Panasonic GH1 is currently leader of the video 
        pack when it comes to ease of operation and usability in real world 
        conditions, making video implementations from competing dSLR's look more 
        like "video hacks" than true integrated functionality.  I'm under 
        no illusion, however, that dSLR video is evolving.  I suspect by 
        fall or early winter, we'll see video capability mature in dSLR or dSLR-like 
        cameras from all manufacturers.  There are already some 
        soon-to-be-released competitors to keep an eye on like the Pentax K-7 
        and the Olympus E-P1 with many others just around the corner.   Mike Chaney |