Title: February 2010: The HP B8850
Post by: admin on January 31, 2010, 08:13:33 PM
February 2010: The HP B8850
Background
Once in a while I take a break from broader subjects to
review a particular product that I find interesting or noteworthy in
some way. This month I'm reviewing the HP B8850 photo printer.
The HP B8850 is not a ground breaking product but I do believe it
warrants some attention because I've found a number of glitches in HP's
driver software that can make this printer difficult to impossible to
use without some workarounds. I've found the B8850 to be a good
pigment printer but there are some things that are worth noting before
buying this printer and some things that can eliminate days of
frustration in working with HP's buggy driver if you already own one.
The Hardware
The B8850 is a formidable
contender in the 13 inch wide pigment printer arena as far as the
hardware is concerned. The printer itself appears to be solid and
well made, if a bit awkward in some ways. The main paper tray, for
example, sits at the bottom of the printer and pulls out the front for
loading. If you want to load multiple sheets of any type of media,
you must pull the paper tray out the front of the printer and load the
paper print-side down in the tray. For this reason, the B8850 will not
only consume almost two feet of space left-to-right on your desk or
printer stand, but also at least an additional foot in front of the
printer must remain clear in order to slide the tray out. There is
a specialty media tray just above the paper output that can be flipped
down to load single sheets. If you have 4x6 sheets loaded in the
main tray for a job and you want to print a single 8x10 or 13x19, this
comes in handy as you do not need to remove the tray and reload/reset
the tray just to print one-up larger sizes.
The B8850 uses eight
cartridges: 5 color cartridges and three B/W cartridges including gray.
The cartridges hold about twice as much ink as most other 13 inch
printers, however, which is welcome on a wider printer. In my testing,
I'm not finding the B8850 to be an ink hog and it seems to be doing
relatively well in the ink usage department. With the larger
cartridges, this is definitely a printer where you'll likely buy
cartridges only as needed rather than buying "ink packs" to have a full
set of extras on hand: a full set of inks for this printer will run you
about $240 minimum!
Initial startup takes 30-40 minutes as the printer
performs its ink charging and calibration, but after the initial
calibration, the printer responds nicely and you rarely find yourself
waiting for "ink charge" cycles that delay your printing (a complaint
that I have with my Canon Pro9000). One thing worthy of
note here: this printer does not produce its own ICC profiles, nor will
it "calibrate" for each type of paper you are using. The automatic
calibration appears to be more of a unit-specific color calibration that
is simply designed to get each individual unit into tighter specs as far
as placement of the ink and a good "mesh" with the heads and stepping
mechanisms which can have slightly different characteristics on each
unit produced. This may not be clear to consumers as some of the
reviews and media hype about the built-in "spectrophotometer" may make
it seem like the printer has its own built in profiling tool: it does
not and cannot produce any type of ICC profile that can be used via your
color management aware software.
I'm happy to report that
this printer produced very good prints on every type of media that I fed
it. Unlike Canon printers which can be a little finicky about the
type of media used, the HP seemed to produce very good prints on any
media, including media from other manufacturers and "generic" brands.
All in all, I do believe the B8850 is a formidable piece of hardware and
a quality piece of equipment. It's such a shame that it is
crippled in some ways by HP's buggy printer driver, but there are
workarounds to make things livable. More on that below!
As far as placement in the market, the B8850 comes in
just below HP's high end 13 inch model: the B9180. The B8850 is
generally about $150 cheaper than the B9180 and is missing some features that, at
least to me, are not show stoppers: no Ethernet port, no on-printer
status display, and lack of ability to handle really thick media.
Otherwise, the B8850 and B9180 produce prints of nearly identical
quality.
Gloss Differential
Call it "bronzing" or
"gloss differential", if you are familiar with pigment ink printers,
you've likely heard that printing good glossy photos can be challenging
with pigment ink. Due to the way the pigment ink interacts with
the surface of the paper, there can be a difference in gloss if you view
the paper from an angle. Areas of the print with plenty of ink can
appear duller than bright or white areas of the paper where the original
gloss still shows through. I did find this to be an issue with the
B8850 as it has no gloss optimizer like the Epson R1900. If you
view a glossy print made on (for example) HP's Advanced Photo Paper
Glossy, you can see areas of high and low gloss and some areas of the
print are just shinier than others. I didn't find it to be a big
issue because, let's face it, how many people sight down the edge of the
paper like you would a warped 2x4? It can be distracting in some
situations, however, and is something to be aware of. You just
won't get that "wet" look from glossy prints like you will a dye printer
like the Canon Pro9000. I did test a number of papers, however,
and found that Canon's Photo Paper Plus Semi-Gloss worked very well in
the B8850 and for most prints, the gloss differential on that type of
paper was not noticeable unless large areas of white were present in the
photo.
The Software
Okay, so the above might
look a little like the summary page from other review sites that
reviewed the B8850. Here's the part you won't get on the other
sites: the truth about HP's buggy printer driver. There are a
number of bugs and other "gotchas" that make using this printer a
nightmare at first. Fortunately there are workarounds for most, so
take a look at what I found while testing this printer.
Bugs, glitches, and other oddities (based on Windows
7 x64 driver):
-
Color management bug turns some prints on HP Advanced
Photo Paper Glossy a mustard yellow:
This is probably the significant bug and cost me quite a bit
of paper and research to figure out. If you are a professional or
advanced amateur, you likely use color management and you have a profile
for your monitor and profiles for each paper you use on your printer.
Kudos to HP for providing real ICC profiles for their own papers and
also
profiles for papers from other manufacturers! BUT... there's a
bug in the driver that will not allow you to use application managed
color via an ICC profile in your printing application if you are using
4x6 or 5x7 HP Advanced Photo Paper Glossy. The driver works fine
for 8x10 or 8.5x11 paper but as soon as you select 4x6 or 5x7 paper size
plus HP Advanced Photo Paper Glossy as the media type plus
"application managed color", you'll get a yellow mustard print every
time. Googling this phenomenon, you can see it has been around for
two years so I have to assume HP has no intention of fixing the problem.
Workaround: You can print using "sRGB" or "Adobe RGB" as the
color selection instead of "application managed color" which is
certainly not ideal. The other option is to select "fiber gloss"
as the paper type and create your own profile using a profiling tool
like Profile Prism.
That's what I did and I've been happy with the results. The bug
only surfaces when you select HP Advanced Photo Paper Glossy, the 4x6
paper size, and "application managed color".
-
Unchecking "Advanced Printing Features" causes paper
to be loaded but no print is produced: I often recommend unchecking
"Enable Advanced Printing Features" in Control Panel under the
properties for a particular printer when printing large prints due to
the fact that many drivers cannot handle large amounts of data with
"Enable Advanced Printing Features" checked. HP has oddly placed
this feature in the driver settings, making it visible to users each
time they print. Unchecking this box in driver settings, however,
will result in the paper loading but no print will be produced.
I've confirmed this with my own
Qimage software and also
other photo editors/printing applications. Perhaps HP should just
rename this checkbox "Allow printer to actually print" because when
unchecked, there is simply no way to get a photo to print.
Workaround: Leave the "Advanced Printing Features" box checked! ;-)
-
Reloading partially used paper can cause the printer
to think no paper is loaded: Sometimes, particularly when testing
color on certain papers, I'll load an 8.5x11 page and print a 4x6 in the
upper left corner. I'll then examine the print, make some
adjustments, and reload the same piece of paper to print another 4x6 in
the upper right of the page in the "empty" spot. You cannot do
that with this printer. It'll see something other than white paper
in the upper left and it will assume the paper didn't load properly and
will give you a paper jam notice.
Workaround: When printing test prints, print from right to left on
the page instead of left to right. Print that first 4x6 in the
upper right of the paper and the next print in the upper left when you
reload the paper. That way, the printer won't get confused.
-
When using the specialty media tray, you get a
warning that the specialty media tray is closed even when it is open
and paper has been loaded: I get a warning that the specialty media
tray is closed when it is in fact open and I've already loaded paper.
Fortunately, you can simply click "Continue" and printing will proceed
normally. Since that tray is a single sheet tray anyway, this is
not a big issue. Workaround:
Just ignore the message and continue.
-
Checking or unchecking "Borderless" fouls up other
settings: Boy, this one is annoying! Let's say you've selected
your paper type (fiber gloss), you've set your print quality to "maximum
dpi", and you've set your paper size to 8x10. Now you click the
"Features" tab and you check "Borderless". As soon as you check
"Borderless", the paper type changes to "HP Advanced Photo Paper Glossy"
and your quality drops from "maximum dpi" to "best". You have to
go back and change the paper type and quality to what you set before
checking "Borderless". This is not a paper type/borderless
incompatibility issue because those settings (paper type and "maximum
dpi") are valid with borderless printing. This is simply another
bug. Workaround: Select
"borderless" before you change other settings or use software like
Qimage
that can save/recall driver settings to avoid mistakes.
-
Printer Services doesn't work: Click the "Printer
Services" button on the "Features" tab and you are greeted by a "Unable
to perform this operation" error message.
That about sums it up for the bugs, glitches, and other
oddities. Some of them may be related to only the Windows 7 x64
version of the driver but I've seen mention of a few issues from the
above list on online forums from people using other operating systems.
Summary
While it may seem I'm being
tough on the B8850, I am using the printer as my main photo printer
right now and I'm happy with it overall. After learning how to
navigate the minefield of driver bugs, the printer is actually a fairly
nice printer to use.
Qimage
has helped a lot because I can set up all the driver settings (and
workarounds) needed and save those for each type and size paper.
Being able to do that has saved me from the potholes you may fall into
while navigating the driver itself. The bottom line is always in
the prints and the B8850 is a good piece of hardware that produces very
nice prints that have a gamut range and quality comparable to other high
end 13 inch printers on the market. While I'm using the B8850
right now and I'm happy with the quality of prints, there is some gloss
differential on all the glossy and semi-gloss media I've tried. I
don't think it's a big issue for most people but my honest take on the
13 inch pigment printer market is: nothing beats an Epson. Epson's
R1900 is the benchmark to beat and it's a shame that HP didn't include a
gloss optimizer cartridge like the R1900 and older R800/R1800 as
that seems to be the only way to get "perfect" glossy prints from a
pigment printer. That said, progress has been made with pigment
inks and the gloss differential of the B8850 isn't a big problem like it
used to be with older models, i.e. the Epson 2200. Hopefully this
article will help potential owners of the B8850 and will help existing
owners as well, as you are likely to run into some of the above issues
at some point.
Mike Chaney
Title: Re: February 2010: The HP B8850
Post by: Owen Glendower on February 01, 2010, 04:21:17 AM
Good article, Mike, thanks much.
Based on your description, the B8850 driver has many of the same quirks as my B8550. For example, if I regularly wanted to print with a "Borderless" setup using other than the default paper and resolution settings, I'd have to create a special "shortcut" with the desired settings and save it as "Borderless-1" or something similar. Then I could choose it in the driver and the special settings would snap into place.
Or--thank heavens!--I can just use Qimage.
Just FYI, the following is what I did first off with my new laptop:
1. Uninstalled Norton. 2. Installed Avira. 3. Installed Firefox with NoScript. 4. Installed Qimage.
I started using Qimage soon after I got my first digital camera--a Sony Mavica, 640x480..."sub-megapixel," as it was tactfully called at the time. Qimage was the only way I could print an acceptable 5x7. Wonderful program.
Title: Re: February 2010: The HP B8850
Post by: dgancarz on August 25, 2010, 06:32:03 PM
Thanks so much for confirming the color management bug in the B8850 driver. I've been driving myself crazy trying to figure out what I must have done to get the terrible color you describe. I'm using 5x7 Ilford Glossy on an XP box with my B8850, so its not just 4x6 and not just Win7 64-bit. As of the end of August 2010, still no updated driver from HP and, as you observe, none likely forthcoming given HP is leaving this market niche. Too bad.
|