Title: FlashPipe v2010.120 released: discuss here Post by: admin on April 15, 2010, 03:03:53 PM http://www.ddisoftware.com/flashpipe
v2010.120 04/15/10 Priority: Low v2010.120 adds support for the new Nikon "NRW" raw photo format. Mike Title: Re: FlashPipe v2010.120 released: discuss here Post by: pszilard on April 28, 2010, 11:25:39 PM Apologies if this is the wrong spot for my post, but I am using v2010.120 so here goes...
I am running FP on a reasonable rig - quad core i7 920 cpu with 6GB triple channel ram and 1TB Raid 10 disks. The OS is W7 Pro 64bit. Inspite of this when FP starts copying, I can't even move its window! I would also like to have a PAUSE and an ABORT button. A way of setting priority. Manually choose ANY source folder Plus it seems to not register my Sony Digicam as a file source, but sometimes picks up my C: drive Pictures folder (as source!). This happens if the digicam is usb connecting its hard drive. If it is connecting its flash memory then FP recognises it. Thanks for a great tool, never the less. I use it after every shoot. Title: Re: FlashPipe v2010.120 released: discuss here Post by: RoundArc on September 25, 2010, 04:35:24 PM Hi Mike,
I'm having a little problem with the file renaming. Im using the ?c_?2?m?d_?h?n?s file mask and every so often there is a discrepancy with the seconds in the file name. Sometimes the seconds are off by up to 2. This seems to happen around where I may have a burst shot that occurs in the same second, but the effect seems to carry over for a few shots. Any ideas? Actually it appears that I have many shots that are off by 1 second when compared to the file name. Could this be a rounding error specific to my camera? I'm using a Sony A330. -RA Title: Re: FlashPipe v2010.120 released: discuss here Post by: Terry-M on September 26, 2010, 07:47:01 PM Hi RA,
Why don't you use ?# (numeric part of camera file name) in the new file name then you should get the true sequence? A burst sequence of several images within 1 second will not be resolved by Windows and that's where the problem lies. There was some discussion of this a week or two back in relation to sorting by date in Qimage. Using the camera number should be reliable to get images in sequence as I understand it. Terry |