agreed

I had a light light black clog last week.  Ran Qimage unclogger with only black/grey checked and could not tell from the Qimage print if the lt lt black channel changed, so between sheets of Qimage unclog pattern I had to run the Epson driver's print head check pattern, eventually gave up gong back and forth and just used the Epson driver auto check and unclog routine and it fixed the problem.

Another thought I have is if Qimage could print a very small footprint nozzle check pattern that could be included in (or just outside) margins of a printed image?  I suggest this as when i had the lt lt black clog it was not immediately apparent in the images as missing lt lt grey just reduces texture gradient and for some images this is very subtle.  I made about 6 prints before I realized what was going on.

This is great.  I renewed my registration!

Just an idea, not sure of possible or really all that practical.

I use 17" roll paper and usually before I print I switch to sheet feed and print the Epson test page on 8.5x11 plain paper to ensure all ink channels are unclogged.  I could print the pattern on the 17" roll, but it uses paper which costs more than a single plain sheet.  But it does take a bit of time (and ergonomically not good or easy for me due to my printer location) to switch paper source and sometimes I damage/crinkle/fingerprint the leading edge of roll when re-feeding into printer.

This has me wondering what the smallest/shortest strip of roll paper Qimage could print a head test pattern on?  Maybe if it was short enough I wouldn't always be compelled to switch paper to check.

Thanks for the tips Mike and I look forward to that update.

The thumb speed increase (.252) and the interval printing capability of the unclog pattern (.248) will certainly make me spring for another year of Qimage updates (I'm stuck on .240 now)

Also want to add that the addition to allow for sorting by exif shot date (instead of file create date) many releases ago was one of the best improvements for my work flow.  I love how Qimage keeps getting better.

excellent, thank you.  At one point in the last few days I switched to 'fast thumbs' and then back and I did have a directory of three images that I am certain I had fully built out before and later noticed that Qimage rebuilt the thumbs and lightening cache a 2nd time, so I thought that may have been the reason.

Yes I do have all four cores used in preferences, it defaulted that way on install.
Your rate is 9sec/image.  For 3500 images that would be 8+3/4 hours.  (I estimated ~10sec per image which is about 10hrs for all)

That math holds up for the 8 images I got printed in about an hour, that was ~45min waiting for thumbs to be built from four different directories and about 15min of minor edits, adding to queue and processing for printing.  That is only four of 60 directories so far and thinking ahead that does not seem very time efficient for printing out a few of the best from the remaining 56 directories, so I came to this forum to ask if there was a quicker way instead of waiting for each directory to be built out.

So I can use 'fast thumbs' and non-lightening RAW, but then I loose out of the cache that has been built so far when I switch.

I understood it the first time   At estimated 10sec an image its about a 10hr wait for all of them.

Bottom line is that if one comes back from a 2mo trip with thousands of photos, Qimage is not ideal to use to determine which 1% should be printed.  Ultimately I will likely print 5%, but want to get the cream first.

I have ~60 directories containing the 3500 images.  My desire is to select about 20-30 of these 3500 images to print.  It takes too long to go to one directory and wait for the 50-200 images to be cached to decide if there is an image in there I want to print.  That is why I use a separate image browser first to find which images I want to select, then target that sub directory in Qimage (and wait and wait to just add one image to the queue before moving to another directory and repeat...).  With this waiting it took me over an hour just to get eight images printed last night and I have barely gotten into the 3500 images yet.  I have a quad core 3ghz system.

This is true, but note that most all of my images are underexposed (to capture sky and other highlights).  I go by composition first and know that I can get the exposure/color correct in Qimage.

Yesterday evening I did select the entire root directory of the 3500 images (about 60 sub folders) and selected the option to generate lightening RAW cache, but several hours later I saw no indication of progress and no way to stop it (OS told me Qimage was unresponsive)  I gave Qimage another hour to get responsive, but eventually gave up and forced a Qimage shutdown.

If I switch to fast thumbs temporarily does Qimage erase the 'non-fast' thumbs and the lightnigh RAW cache?  I don't want to loose the 600 or so that have already been generated.

I just got back from a 2 month trip with over 3500 images taken.  They are in folders by date, some have 3 images, some have 300.
I want to be able to quickly scan thru the images and pick a few of the very best to print
However it takes a very long time for Qimage to load up the thumbnails, then create lightning RAW cache - with the rest of Qimage slowed down to a near stop during the process.

Is there a way I can have Qimage just load the embedded thumbnails that are in the RAW file already as I open and search for images?  I am happy to let Qimage process it's custom thumbs/lightening RAW later, but initially can't afford the time it will take to do all 3500?

My work around is to use a separate image browser (in this case Fastone Viewer) which can load up and display the RAW images in a directory near instantaneously.  Then I can find the images I want to print and go to Qimage, to open the specific date from the trip.  This however is also frustrating as I may have one image from one day and one from another so I still have to wait a very long time just to work on those two images out of a directory of hundreds.

This was not previously an issue for me as I loaded only 100-200 images at a time into Qimage from a weekend trip and waiting for the thumbs was not as big a deal.

Thanks.

My Qimage PC is not connected to internet so I can't see these videos.  I also learn so much better from written material.

OK. I'll try that, but it is not obvious from the instructions/dialog box.
It seems that one can not selectively run the routine on for example just light grey as if one checks the black/grey box it will run the routine on black, med grey and light grey ink.  That is better than running all the inks of course if just one is clogged.

I have upgraded to a version with the print unclogger and was trying to use it last night, but noted that the color selection in the dialog box
(your screen shot above) does not match the 8 colors in the Epson.

If a printer (in this case Epson 4800) has these 8 inks: light grey, med grey, black, yellow, light cyn, drk cyan, lt magenta, dk magenta.  How do I map this to the Qimage print unclogger color selections?
Can I selectively run unclog on just one of the 8 Epson inks?