Forgive me for stating the obvious. The cost of ink is often more relevant than the price of the printer. It seems the printer is often provided at a nominal price with special, low volume cartridges supplied - then when you need replacement cartridges surprisingly soon and at a similarly surprising price you realise what's going on.
If you can raise the capital, the Epson 3880 is a pretty good deal - it comes with 9 cartridges, each 80ml. And being larger cartridges the replacement costs are good on a ml/£ basis. It's an A3 printer but has an unusually small footprint for that size.
Sandy
Hi Sandy
No issue stating the obvious
Yes, inks were going to be factored in and yes I know they sell the printers at daft low costs especially the typical SOHO ones. I had not thought of the A3 other than thinking they were rather too costly and had way too large a footprint so will check that out.
Oh as for the inks the place I used to use when I last had an inkjet had the OEM ones as sets on special offer every so often so was good.
FWIW I used inkjets for way too much general printing of docs etc and in the space of 4 to 5 years got end of life events with both an Epson which lasted 3 years and a Canon PIXMA which lasted just over 15 months, neither of which was economic to repair!!!! Talk about the throwaway society
Currently using a small monochrome laser for docs and HP P1102W that has printed over 8500 sheets in approx 18 months
Edit ~ just checked out the UK price at over £1100 is way OTT for me and the planned usage. If I could justify that sort of money I would be giving serious consideration to a dye sub. Oh and it is described as an A2 printer