Curious...
Was the crop scissor on for that image?
Did you set the print size to 5 x7 in QU?
What are the image dimensions in pixels?
The question above is important.
Fred

I would try turning crop scissor on. My thinking is that turning the crop scissor on should not affect an image that is cropped to 5 x 7 dimensions, and it should force the odd one to a 5 x 7  print size.
Any chance of making a jpg from whatever that type that is and emailing it?    wathree.ssz@verizon.net I can handle a  30 Mb email file.
Fred

Thanks for the response Mike. You are always prompt to reply.
It is not a big deal, I was able to print it on my Pro-1000. (Printer in question was pro-100) I was also able to print the same combination using lightroom. I just thought it was interesting. I figured someone would say it was a print spooling issue and indeed it might be, you are the expert after all. However, as I mentioned it also did it when printing only the two images shown (not 40), reversing the order, and then only the one image alone. When I have had what I suspect were network issues the whole page partially prints and the remaining is ejected. In this case, as you see part of the first image did not print always in the same spot, and the second image prints normally. I guess the pro-100 simply does not like spider tattoos.
PS In response to the other kind gentleman, just for fun, I turned the auto-cropping on and it still did the same thing.
PSPS Just for fun I thought I would see what happens when I add a black border to both images. They both print fully with a black border. I take away the border and it goes back to a partial image on the spider only. I turn on raw in spooling as suggested, no change, only part of the spider prints.
No worries, thanks again.
Jason

Good morning,
Just in case I got lucky, I was playing around in QU. To what end, I don't really know since I don't have the spider image, but I just wanted to see....
I made a 5 x 7 in QU, using crop lock on, in the image editor. I saved it and opened it using Custom.... Open with Original Size which I set to 350 ppi with over ride checked. Came out perfect. I was just wondering what you would see if you opened the image using the above method.
I BELIEVE Mike asked for the image. That would be great. I guarantee he will find it.
Fred

Thanks for the file.  It's no trouble.  I set everything as close to your settings as possible and printed on my Pro-100.  I even set Matte paper and your Pyramid selection for interpolation.  The file printed fine (the whole 5x7).  So I'm afraid I have no explanation for this one.  I do have some suggestions for dealing with a job like this:

- First, don't use LR to rescale or crop images.  Cropping to 5x7 and resampling to 350 PPI in Lightroom will actually degrade quality a little bit: let Qimage do all of that.

- The cropping and resizing is more easily performed in Qimage: just add the originals at 5x7 print size and then adjust crop as necessary.  Then Qimage automatically upsamples to 600 PPI at print time (at higher quality than LR).

- Switch off the old Pyramid interpolation and always use Fusion.  It's just better. 

Honestly, just point Qimage at the folder containing all the tattoo pictures and add them all at 5x7 print size.  If cropping is needed (including rotating the crop to the other landscape/portrait orientation), that is super easy using Qimage's print cropping tool.  That would save you a lot of time and in the end give you the highest quality prints... without ever having to open Lightroom.  If you need to make minor adjustments like contrast, levels, etc. and would rather do those in LR instead of QU because you are familiar with doing it in LR, that's fine... but don't ever resample (change the resolution) in LR.  That should only be done at print time.  As a general rule, pixel dimensions (file size) should never be changed from the original size in another program.  Qimage can get a better quality print if it knows how many original pixels were captured!

Regards,
Mike

Thanks so much for the efforts!
No wonder why you have so many loyal QU followers.
Thank you for the recommendations, I am always looking to improve. I have been using Qimage for just over a year.
May I ask one follow up to your recommendations?
I actually just recently started trying the old pyramid based on my (miss)reading of "help" screens, I had been using the fusion at the default setting. Most of what I print I think would be considered largish files of good quality, 75% portraits, so the cellphone prints in this discussion are the exception. Are there any other recommendations for best print quality. Canon Pro-1000 w/OEM ink used for professional work and Canon pro-100 w/3rd party ink used for play and experimentation. Typically I am using ICC profiles I created with i1Studio.
I look forward to looking closer at your recommendations.
And thanks to Fred for his efforts.
Best wishes, Jason