|
Title: Preferred CMM Post by: rani on December 18, 2014, 12:02:09 PM Hi guys,
I did not see any reference anywhere so i ask here: I make my own profiles with i1pro2 and i1Profiler software. win 8.1 64 bit. CS6 Conversion Option Engine is set to: Adobe (ACE) Intent is set to: Perceptual Working Space is set to Adobe RGB (1998) ALL my printing jobs are done with Qimage. When inspecting the profiles in ColorThink I see the Preferred CMM is left blank. What is the right one to choose from: ADBE (Adobe) APPL (Apple) KCMS (Kodak) Lino LOGO (LOGO/Gretagmacbeth) MSFT (Microsoft) Any advice would be MUCH appreciated.. Title: Re: Preferred CMM Post by: Terry-M on December 18, 2014, 01:35:17 PM The version history of QU says:
v2014.203 Mar 17, 2014 Low v2014.203 updates the color management engine to the new LCMS 2.6 (released March 16) I doubt if you have to worry about this matter, QU is probably smart enough so as not to need it specified in the profile. Terry PS. Why don't you ask the i1pro2 and i1Profiler software developers, their program left it blank, not QU! Title: Re: Preferred CMM Post by: rani on December 18, 2014, 04:07:05 PM Thank you!
Because QU guys are friendly :) Title: Re: Preferred CMM Post by: daniellouwrens on December 19, 2014, 10:18:09 PM "Because QU guys are friendly :)"
Also true of Profile Prism guys :-) I use PP, it is great, and works well with QU, that's not saying the others don't work well with QU because I know many people use other profile creators, but PP has Mike, Fred and Terry (heroes) in support. Just my 18c worth (inflation) cheers Daniel Title: Re: Preferred CMM Post by: rani on December 21, 2014, 06:49:25 PM Do one have to scan only with scanner/camera or can one scan with i1pro2 through the PP workflow?
Title: Re: Preferred CMM Post by: Fred A on December 22, 2014, 10:33:40 AM Quote Do one have to scan only with scanner/camera or can one scan with i1pro2 through the PP workflow? Hi Rani,I cannot definitively say yes or no, because there might be a work around. I did spend some time on their web site playing a few videos related to your question. I would think not. They have a self contained system. The printer prints out a target that is built in, and it looks like it reads it's own results. I have never seen or used one of these units, so that is my "GUESS" Maybe someone on here can shed light on it for us. Fred |