Mike Chaney's Tech Corner
November 17, 2024, 01:31:32 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Qimage registration expired? New lifetime licenses are only $59.99!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Qimage Folder on HD vs SSD  (Read 4254 times)
Martin van Gog
Newbie
*
Posts: 28



Email
« on: February 27, 2019, 02:46:52 PM »


Hi outthere,

I'm busy to configure a 'dedicated High-End Workstation' for postprocessing. I've an question; Does Qimage benefits from a SSD for it's data-storage or will a traditional HD be sufficient?

With  regards, Martin
Logged
Terry-M
The Honourable Metric Mann
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3251



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2019, 04:42:29 PM »

Hi Martin,
I've had an 240GB SSD C-drive for some time with a 1TB HDD D-drive for files.
Initially I ran Q with the Application Data on the C-drive but as the C-drive has relatively small capacity and as the App Data, particularly the raw cache built up, I migrated the QU App data to the D-drive. I do maintain the raw cache to reduce it now and again, but with it on the D-drive it is less critical to do that.
I did not see any slowdown of QU processing when the App Data was on the D-drive.
I think the factor that affects processing speed most (cache building and printing) is the processor and it's speed. Modern processors of a similar speed with 8 threads are faster than my 10 year old i7-3.5Ghz model.
Terry.

Edit: you could try both locations for the App data as it's easy to migrate using the QU Utilities feature. Time each various processes for each location. T
« Last Edit: February 27, 2019, 04:46:49 PM by Terry-M » Logged
Martin van Gog
Newbie
*
Posts: 28



Email
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2019, 10:47:35 PM »

Hi Terry,

The candiate CPU is 8 C = 16 threads. (Frequency of processor: 3.6 Ghz, Turbo: 4.3 Ghz)
Of course I can try both, HD or SSD. But that isn't very operative, because I want to buy a dedicated drive for Qimage.

So I want to start directly with the right choice.

There are six drive bays (2 x 3.5" & 4 x 2.5") + for Lightroom Data; a PCIe NVMe 1 TB SSD.

With regards, Martin
Logged
Terry-M
The Honourable Metric Mann
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3251



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2019, 11:02:20 AM »

Sounds like your processor is pretty good.
SSD's have a faster read write speed than HDD so if QU program and data and images are on SSD's, it should be the fastest option. I'm sure why it's necessary to have the QU program and App data on a separate drive from Windows?
Terry
Logged
Martin van Gog
Newbie
*
Posts: 28



Email
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2019, 03:02:36 AM »

Sounds like your processor is pretty good.
SSD's have a faster read write speed than HDD so if QU program and data and images are on SSD's, it should be the fastest option. I'm sure why it's necessary to have the QU program and App data on a separate drive from Windows?
Terry

Hi Terry,

My OS is on 'a second gen SSD', namely a PCIe NVME drive ((capacity: 512 GB, (NVME SSD can deliver speeds more than six times faster than the fastest SATA SSD's (up to 3,400 MB/s vs 545 MB/s, (HDD is 125 MB/s))
That's the same reason why Therry-M moves his files from a C:\OS SSD to a D:\DATA HDD. I'm going to move the files from C:\OS NVME to X:\{Qimage} SSD

With regards, Martin
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Security updates 2022 by ddisoftware, Inc.