I had a customer bring in a damaged sepia tone to copy/repair so i photographed it and then resepia toned the image in lr to get it same as the original.
when I printed it in Qimage however it came out as a b/w?
 So I tried to print in LR and CS5 and it came out fine just like the screen image.
Why did Qimage produce a b/w ? how is that possible?
every thing is calibrated and the Qimage out put normally for b/w and colour is spot on but not with this sepia .
any ideas any one.
images attached.

I get similar results to Fred.
Sky 115,110,98
White cliff 205,198,192
Cliff top on LHS 26,19,13
All the readings seem to show a small bias towards red - is that sepia?
I too did a small print on Ilford smooth pearl with a proven custom profile and a print the matched the calibrated monitor perfectly when examined under an Ott light.
Like the RGB readings & screen, the print seemed just a little warm but not a definite sepia tone.
There are some things we need to ask, which may seem rather obvious to a pro!
Are you using layers in the image to give the sepia effect which are not read by Qimage or show up on your attachment. They need to be flattened.
Are you using a fully colour managed process with monitor profiled and a good printer profile.
Have you checked your driver settings from within Qimage? Make sure they are set for ICM no colour adjustment etc. and that grey scale printing has not been accidently ticked.
That's all I can think of for now but what you show on your attachment is a slightly warm B&W image, not a definite sepia as I would understand it.
Terry
PS. I read your image as being Adobe RGB colour space.

The one image was 187KB and the total limit for attachments per post is 256KB that is why one disappeared.
We await the other one with interest 
Terry

here is the original that I had to work with, I cant save any smaller than this with PS so only one image. the original was very grainy which i initially removed but then put back as the task was to try to duplicate the damaged print.
there are some undamaged ares which was what my "sepia" tone is  replicating.
Once I repaired the damage I converted to b/w to remove all the colour casts and then added the sepia gradually to get as close as possible to the faded original which is what the client wants.
what I don't under stand was what setting I have applied or unwittingly set in Qimage that make it ignore the sepia or more probably is converting it back to b/w. It has to be me of that I'm sure as  the program produced two perfect colour prints also water damaged and repaired from the same client.  

Hi,
I've downloaded the original image (what a mess!) and got the following RGB reading for similar areas as the repaired image.
Sky 115, 106 87
Cliff face 201, 191, 173
Cliff top on RHS 26, 21 17
These reading are slightly biased to having less blue than your repaired image, ie. more yellow.
I'm sure if I printed it I would get a good match.
There is only one way for this to happen in QU, that is a filter has been applied with the Image Editor. The file name under the thumb will turn red to show that. There could be a print filter set and that would show as a tick in the P.Filter box, bottom right of the main screen.
Have you got some weird profile set in Qimage?
Terry

what do you use to resize? ps save as smallest is ok size wise but wrecks the iq

ignore the image atteched here it is a early attempt I saved my mistake.

Thanks for the offer I have found for some reason that if I use the sepia tone preset in LR develop mode and save it then it gets lost or is not shown unless Lr or PS prints it, however for some reason if i add  a sepia tone in PS and reduce the opacity till it matches the print, flatten the 2 layers it and try Qimage then Qimage faithfully prints it. either something odd with my set up or a Lr anomaly anyway I know next time if I want to print sepia tone how to do it.