Mike Chaney's Tech Corner
November 23, 2024, 05:21:51 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Qimage registration expired? New lifetime licenses are only $59.99!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: A question regarding output image bit depth  (Read 13079 times)
Steaphany
Newbie
*
Posts: 5



Email
« on: August 10, 2009, 01:20:19 PM »

Sorry in advance if the has been discussed else where or if this is a RTFM subject.

When patch processing images and saving the output as newly created Tif format files, How can the bit depth be specified to be something other than 24 bits per pixel/8 bits per channel ?

For example, I just processed a set of images where originally 16 bit per channel and the saved Qimage output was 8.
Logged
Fred A
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 5644



WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 03:13:22 PM »

Quote
For example, I just processed a set of images where originally 16 bit per channel and the saved Qimage output was 8.

Whether discussed before or not, always good to refresh certain topics.
It is my understanding that, at the present time, Qimage does all processing in 8 bit mode.
It is also my understanding that printing from Qimage is an 8 bit adventure as it conforms to Windows printing routines.
Plans are afoot to move to 16 bit for printing and perhaps batch filtering in the future.
Right now 16 bit images have yet to wow anyone with any visible detectable differences. It just makes bigger files which get converted back to 8 bit for printing anyway.
Best I can offer. Maybe Mike will have time to clarify.
Great question, though!

Fred
Logged
Seth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 322



« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 09:23:52 PM »

Fred-
I agree.  There are those that say they have printed both ways and can see the difference.  Kind of like those that see the difference in bi-directional printing and High Speed Off.  I think if one does it themselves they may want to see it.  At the normal viewing distance for a photograph (2-5x the diagonal) I doubt it.

That said, the paper and droplet sizes in different prints surely are a part of that equation.

As to the larger 16-bit files, I think they should be saved.  All I do is reduce to 8-bit and call it ###A or -8. That's what I print in QI. 
Adjusting 16-bit images in editing software has it's place for quality.
Logged

Seth
<CWO4 (FMF) USN, Ret.>
Steaphany
Newbie
*
Posts: 5



Email
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2009, 04:21:26 PM »

Thank you for your answers.

I do understand the limitations brought about by printed media, but my use of Qimage is more to perform in-process flow manipulations of the type that can't be achieved else where. It was my hope that Qimage had a flag to save files in 16 or 32 bit per channel which minimize banding should the Qimage output file need processing with another image manipulation package afterwards.

With the 8 bit limitation in mind, I need to plan for Qimage being the final step post processing.
Logged
Terry-M
The Honourable Metric Mann
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3251



WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2009, 05:17:34 PM »

Quote
All I do is reduce to 8-bit and call it ###A or -8. That's what I print in QI.
I'm fairly sure Qimage will open 16 bit files; it converts to 8 bit automatically. So there is probably no need to make a special 8 bit file for printing.
Terry
Edit: just checked, Q opens 16 bit tif no problems. Image info' say's it's 48 bit (16x3 of course)
T
« Last Edit: August 11, 2009, 05:32:09 PM by Terry-M » Logged
Seth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 322



« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2009, 06:28:26 PM »

I'm fairly sure Qimage will open 16 bit files; it converts to 8 bit automatically. So there is probably no need to make a special 8 bit file for printing.
Terry
Edit: just checked, Q opens 16 bit tif no problems. Image info' say's it's 48 bit (16x3 of course)
T

Yes, I do that if I don't PS it first.  I don't know WHAT Mike does with 14-bit NEF files--to 16 or 8 bit. 

The reason I create an 8-bit from a 16 is only for QI.  Not because it cannot handle it; it just speeds up the "processing" when actually printing.  I don't know that leaving it at 16-bit and letting QI reduce it would be any better quality or not.  Only Mike knows what he is doing there.
Logged

Seth
<CWO4 (FMF) USN, Ret.>
Terry-M
The Honourable Metric Mann
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 3251



WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2009, 07:12:24 PM »

Quote
I don't know WHAT Mike does with 14-bit NEF files--to 16 or 8 bit.
If I remember correctly from previous posts on Yahoo, raw files are processed as 16 bit, but in the batch filter it's 8 bit.

Quote
Only Mike knows what he is doing there.
He sure does  Smiley He'll chime in, I'm sure, if what I said is incorrect.
Terry.

Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Security updates 2022 by ddisoftware, Inc.