Hi,
I've been investigating some color management issues that I had assumed were with my printer, but it looks like part of the problem is with QImage. I know that color management is easy to mess up, so bear with my and I'll try and demonstrate that I've been reasonably thorough before suggesting a QImage problem.
I wanted some standard test targets to experiment with, so after some searching I downloaded the following synthetic test charts from
http://www.babelcolor.com/main_level/ColorChecker.htmColorChecker_Lab_from_Avg.tif
ColorChecker_ProPhoto_from_Avg_16bit.tif
ColorChecker_AdobeRGB_from_Avg_16bit.tif
These are slightly odd in that they are not tagged with their respective color profiles, so on loading them into photoshop they each look visibly different. I assigned the appropriate color space to each of the rgb files (all three then looked the same on screen) and saved them. I then printed all three via QImage onto a variety of different papers. In QImage the color spaces are correctly identified.
What was immediately obvious was that the Lab version was very different to the other two versions. I also found that switching between perceptual and absolute colorimetric caused the proPhoto version to take on a marked warm shift on the grey scale. In previous versions the AdobeRGB version took on a cool shift, but this seems to have gone after updating to 2010.100
I realised I can show this by printing to a jpeg, here's an example with the three versions of the chart, using AC rendering intent:
Perceptual looks better, but the Lab is still very different:
I then tried doing the same thing printing from Lightroom, and all three versions rendered very similarly (on the print, I don't think I could tell them apart). Lightroom can also print to file, so here is the lightroom version:
These test ouputs are on flickr if you want to look in more detail:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/74697159@N00/sets/72157622518862305/I can only claim a partial understanding of the issues of color spaces, but it looks to me like there is something odd going on here!
Regards,
James.