| 
							admin
							
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 «  on: May 28, 2009, 10:46:39 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							
June 2009: Removing 
the Blindfold from the dSLR
         
         
        Background 
        
        Last month I discussed the 
        new Micro Four Thirds format being offered in cameras such as the 
        Panasonic G1 and GH1.  Note that Olympus/Panasonic have used Four 
        Thirds format for years, it's the "Micro" part that makes Micro Four 
        Thirds interesting as it removes the mirror mechanism from the camera.  
        Last month it was merely a promising technical curiosity but this month 
        I got my hands on a G1 and this new technology has become much more than 
        just a curiosity.  Right away I started noticing what a dSLR can do 
        when there is no blindfold (mirror) obstructing the main sensor for 
        important operations like focus, metering, and framing. Of course, when 
        you remove the mirror from the dSLR, it is no longer technically a dSLR 
        but such a camera still feels and operates very much like a dSLR with 
        some very interesting added perks!  Let's take a look at what a 
        dSLR style camera can really do when you remove the mirror and open the 
        camera's eye to the world it is about to photograph. 
         
          
        
        Focus 
        
        
        Traditional dSLR: It 
        might seem like an odd statement but as far as focus, the traditional 
        dSLR is handicapped at the starting line!  When you activate a 
        dSLR's auto-focus, you can see through the lens but the primary sensor 
        (the sensor that is about to capture your image) is completely blind to 
        what you are about to shoot.  Instead, light is bounced into a secondary 
        focus mechanism near the top of the camera that performs some phase 
        based calculations to calculate where the focus ring on the lens should 
        be turned in order to achieve proper focus.  Due to slack in the 
        lens' servo mechanism and slight errors caused by the positioning of the 
        focus mechanism and lens, focus on a traditional dSLR is based on 
        prediction only.  When the mirror is flipped out of the way and the 
        shutter is opened, slight errors in the prediction can sometimes cause 
        auto-focus errors.  This is why we hear so much talk about people 
        getting their lenses calibrated to their camera bodies.  Seldom do 
        a lens/body pair match so perfectly that you get perfect focus for the 
        entire zoom range (on a zoom lens). 
        Mirrorless "dSLR": 
        The mirrorless dSLR sees the world clearly because the main image sensor 
        is always being exposed to the scene.  Fast contrast detection auto 
        focus like that implemented on the Panasonic G1 and GH1 simply look at 
        the part of the image that is in the focus point in the viewfinder and 
        adjusts focus until perfect focus is achieved.  Since this 
        operation is a honing and confirmation process, there is no error 
        involved and the camera will give perfect focus every time because the 
        sensor can see what it is about to capture.  Well, perfect provided 
        you don't do something silly like try to focus on a featureless white 
        wall.  Gone are the days of worrying about sending camera bodies 
        and lenses in to the manufacturer for calibration or spending hours 
        fiddling with lens fine tuning in a camera menu only to find that the 
        adjustments only work for part of the zoom range on your zoom lens! 
          
         
        
        Metering 
        
        
        Traditional dSLR: 
        Again, the dSLR cannot "see" when you are giving the shutter button a 
        half press.  If you can see through the lens, the sensor cannot, so 
        light is rerouted to what (typically) amounts to a tiny 32 pixel sensor 
        in the top of the camera that tries to detect the amount of light in the 
        scene.  While it is a very course measurement, it usually works 
        pretty well but the pitfalls include exposure surprises where the matrix 
        (32 pixel array) overestimated/underestimated how big that specular 
        highlight or reflection really was. 
        Mirrorless "dSLR": 
        With its sensor continuously exposed to the entire image, the mirrorless 
        dSLR is free to look at the entire image at much higher resolution.  
        The result is far fewer surprises when it comes to metering! 
         
          
        
        Viewfinder Error 
        
        
        Traditional dSLR: If 
        you are someone who has used traditional dSLR's for years like me, 
        you're used to framing the subject through the viewfinder only to find 
        that the camera actually captured a little more than what you had 
        framed.  The difference is caused by the 
        viewfinder having a slightly different angle of view than when the light 
        goes to the actual image sensor.  Some cameras/lenses suffer more 
        from this effect than others. 
        Mirrorless "dSLR": 
        Because the mirrorless dSLR has no optical viewfinder, what you see 
        through the electronic viewfinder is exactly what you'll get in the 
        photograph.  This is because you are looking at what the sensor is 
        actually seeing.  Now you can see exactly how your subject is being 
        framed. 
          
         
        
        Camera Size 
        
        
        Traditional dSLR: 
        Due to the added mechanical complexity involved in having a mirror and 
        separate focus and metering mechanisms, the traditional dSLR is normally 
        a pretty bulky tool to carry. 
        Mirrorless "dSLR": 
        With reduced mechanical complexity comes the freedom to reduce physical 
        size.  The lens to sensor distance and overall bulk can be reduced 
        in mirrorless designs making cameras more compact. 
         
          
        
        Perks of a Mirrorless Design: Lots of Perks! 
        
        
        It's amazing what can be done once you remove that 
        blindfold we call a mirror from the dSLR!  With the main sensor's 
        eye to the world open and an electronic viewfinder for you to see 
        through, here's what cameras like the Panasonic G1/G1H can offer in 
        addition to the main advantages above.  These are what I consider 
        to be icing on the cake: 
          
            - 
        
Real time histograms: Look through the viewfinder 
        and there it is: a real time histogram of the scene being displayed 
        continuously before the picture is taken!  Remember, with 
        the mirrorless design, you are not the only one who can see that scene 
        you are about to shoot: the camera can see it too. 
             
            - 
        
Intelligent ISO: The G1 has something called 
        "Intelligent ISO".  Going beyond the traditional auto-ISO found on 
        other cameras, intelligent ISO not only looks at the amount of light and 
        the current zoom (focal length) of the lens, it can watch the subject 
        and determine if an even higher ISO speed is needed due to the subject 
        moving in the scene!  Once again, because the main sensor can see 
        what is happening, it can see that the flower you are about to 
        photograph is moving in the breeze and based on the amount of movement, 
        it might increase the ISO speed further to compensate based on the 
        movement that is occurring the instant you press the shutter button.  
        The result is that you get exactly the amount of ISO speed you need for 
        the current capture, no more, no less! 
             
            - 
        
Viewfinder menus: Because the viewfinder is 
        actually a high resolution digital display, you can open/operate camera 
        menus without ever taking your eye away from the viewfinder!  I 
        find that I almost never use the rear LCD for these tasks any more: I 
        leave it closed and the screen facing in to protect it.  When I 
        want to activate a function or change a custom function, I use my thumb 
        on the menu/direction pad and just operate the menus directly from the 
        viewfinder. 
             
            - 
        
Viewfinder blackout: Because there is nothing 
        that has to obstruct the viewfinder while taking a shot, your view 
        through the lens does not disappear when you press the shutter like a 
        typical dSLR.  Instead, the image is captured instantly and it 
        appears as if you have frozen time: the subject simply stops moving and 
        you see the still instantly.  I didn't think this was a big deal 
        until I realized now you can see things that happen the moment the 
        shutter is actuated such as people moving at the last second and 
        creating motion blur, someone blinking, etc. 
             
            - 
        
Mirror noise/vibration: While it isn't a big deal 
        to me, a mirrorless design offers quieter performance and no mirror slap 
        that can sometimes blur shots from a typical dSLR.  The G1 does 
        have a mechanical shutter of sorts, but it is nowhere near as loud as a 
        typical dSLR because it's primary purpose is to block light from the 
        sensor during part of the image acquisition phase.  Basically the 
        sensor needs to be in darkness so that no further charge is accumulated 
        on the chip while the data is read from the sensor. 
             
            - 
        
Viewfinder display freedom: Because the 
        viewfinder is electronic, there's a lot more freedom to display 
        important information, icons, and things like real time histograms right 
        in the viewfinder.  Want to see a rule-of-thirds overlay for this 
        shot?  No problem: activate the feature and it pops up as a 
        template in the viewfinder.  When you capture a shot, the shot is 
        displayed in high resolution in the viewfinder too, so no need to pull 
        the camera away from your face to view the preview on the LCD: it's 
        right there where you were already looking and focusing your eyes. 
             
           
 
          
        
        What About "Live View"  
        on traditional dSLR's?
        
        While some late model 
        traditional dSLR's offer a live view mode where the main sensor is 
        open to the scene, truth be told these operate more like a kludge on 
        most current models than a feature you can really use.  Because the 
        rest of the camera wasn't designed to make use of the live view, the 
        main autofocus and metering mechanisms are "blind" while in live view 
        mode.  Some cameras offer a (slow) contrast detect autofocus while 
        in live view mode but it is so slow that you wouldn't want to use it.  
        In addition, the LCD screen just isn't good enough to judge focus while 
        the electronic viewfinder on the G1 works well for manual focus, is 
        bright, and is unaffected by the sun.  Live view on a traditional 
        dSLR is more a bandaid to allow access to some features (like video).  
        When you think about it, in one hand you have autofocus and metering and 
        in the other hand live view.  The mirror can only be in one place 
        at any given time so either you are using live view and blinding your 
        autofocus/metering system or vice versa: you enable those and blind the 
        image sensor.  With a mirrorless design, you get the best of both 
        worlds. 
          
         
        
        Mirrorless in Operation 
        
        By now some of you are 
        probably wondering how an electronic viewfinder and contrast autofocus 
        work in the real world.  Surely there must be a down side to using 
        a camera like the G1.  People are used to contrast detection 
        autofocus being super slow.  Is it on the G1?  People say that 
        electronic viewfinders don't offer a good view and are laggy and noisy?  
        Does the G1 viewfinder lag and get noisy and is it useless for manual 
        focus?  In short, the contrast detection autofocus is just as fast 
        or at least very close to the speed of my past dSLR cameras.  In 
        addition, when the G1 locks on, you know for a fact your image will be 
        in focus and the area where you focused is exactly where the focus will 
        be when you see the final image: no surprises or front/back focus 
        errors.  As for the viewfinder, I was amazed at the resolution and 
        brightness of the electronic viewfinder in the G1.  Outdoors or in 
        bright light, you don't really even notice it is an electronic 
        viewfinder.  Only in (very) low light does it get laggy, meaning 
        jerky/slow like a very slow framerate video.  To be honest, when I 
        point the G1 at the area under my computer desk where the shadows are 
        quite dark, the G1's viewfinder gets very grainy and only updates maybe 
        5 times a second.  It doesn't look pretty but it actually gives a 
        brighter picture than your eyes can even see.  When I point my 
        other traditional dSLR's at the same area, the viewfinder is almost 
        completely black.  So even though noisy and slow, if you aren't 
        shooting fast moving objects, you can still see more through the G1's 
        viewfinder.  Overall I have yet to find a single drawback to the G1 
        that gets in the way of my shooting.  It isn't a particularly fast 
        camera at only 3 frames per second but that really has nothing to do 
        with the mirrorless design.  The G1 is also not at the top of the 
        heap as far as image quality and low noise at high ISO like some other 
        high end dSLR's but it isn't far off and to me, the benefits far 
        outweigh something like a 10% hit in image performance.  Due to the 
        design, I find myself getting a very noticeable increase in the ratio of 
        "keepers" versus "toss" photos compared to other cameras. 
          
         
        
        Summary 
        
        I'm happy to say that I am 
        very excited about the mirrorless dSLR both in concept and in practice 
        when using the Panasonic G1.  Considering the Panasonic G1 is the 
        first dSLR-like camera to sport a mirrorless design and given all that 
        it can do, the traditional dSLR may really be evolving into something 
        better.  Technology of any new design is sure to improve over time 
        and considering that the G1 has blown me away at the starting gate, I 
        see only good things to come with the mirrorless dSLR design.  The 
        G1 may not have the silky smooth ISO 1600 performance of a high end dSLR 
        or the shallow depth of field offered by a full frame dSLR but it sure 
        does eliminate a lot of the pitfalls of the traditional dSLR that have 
        become my pet peeves over the years.  I look forward to more models 
        using a mirrorless design in the future. 
         
          
        Mike Chaney 
         
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
									« Last Edit: June 02, 2009, 02:57:26 PM by Mike Chaney »
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						
							johngie
							
								Newbie 
								 
								Posts: 28
								
								
								
								
								
								  
							 
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #1 on: May 29, 2009, 03:05:05 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							Wow, shades (no pun intended!) of the old Canon Pellix!
 
  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						
							photoalbummaker
							
								Newbie 
								 
								Posts: 3
								
								
								
								
								
							  
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #2 on: May 29, 2009, 03:14:15 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							Very informative. I'm looking forward for more like this. Thanks, Mike. 
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						
							DdeGannes
							
								Full Member 
								   
								Posts: 175
								
								 
								Retired Banker; Golf; Photography; Travel.
								
								
								
								
								
							  
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #3 on: May 29, 2009, 05:35:21 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							Thanks for this informative article. I am a Olympus user and they expect to launch their micro 4/3 in the next few months, this make me even more interested to see what enhancements they produce. 
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
							 
							COMP EQP: iMac 27" mid 2015 5K Retina macOS 11.2.3; 24GB Ram; Scan Elite 5400 film scr. CAMERA EQP: Oly OMD EM-1, Digital Zuiko & OM lenses. Imaging Apps: PS CC 20; LR Classic CC 9.3; Qimage U & One; VueScan. 
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						
							KenFred
							
								Newbie 
								 
								Posts: 1
								
								
								
								
								
								  
							 
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #4 on: June 10, 2009, 06:32:04 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							   Sounds very familiar to Minolta A2 users. I have a Minolta A1, which is not as highly spec'd as the A2, but they both have many of the features of the Panasonic G1, and they have both been around for many years now. I realise the Panasonic G1/GH1 have somewhat better performance, but also somewhat higher price. In the meantime my A1 is giving me good performance for the money, and I cannot afford to update to the latest/greatest new camera every few years. Thanks for the excellent article and forum.  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						| 
							Seth
							
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #5 on: July 08, 2009, 01:22:00 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							The only thing missing was the downside of that technology, at least for now.
  Carrying such a rig while the system is still on can really burn up some pixels as it bounces into full view of the sun, etc.  The mirror protects that until the system powers down.
  The other thing on an interchangeable lens camera is dust.  Right now, although sensors get dirty, the mirror catches most of it.  I know there is a filter and/or cover over the sensor, but the extra barrier is a blessing more often than not.
  Until Nikon and Canon come up with a reliable way to clean a sensor in the camera, having that mirror there when changing lenses at football, NASCAR, Indy--even some landscapes--is a blessing. 
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
							 
							Seth <CWO4 (FMF) USN, Ret.> 
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						| 
							admin
							
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #6 on: July 08, 2009, 03:30:55 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							The only thing missing was the downside of that technology, at least for now.
  Carrying such a rig while the system is still on can really burn up some pixels as it bounces into full view of the sun, etc.  The mirror protects that until the system powers down.
  The other thing on an interchangeable lens camera is dust.  Right now, although sensors get dirty, the mirror catches most of it.  I know there is a filter and/or cover over the sensor, but the extra barrier is a blessing more often than not.
  Until Nikon and Canon come up with a reliable way to clean a sensor in the camera, having that mirror there when changing lenses at football, NASCAR, Indy--even some landscapes--is a blessing.
  Interesting but I'm not convinced either of those is a significant down side.  When I'm carrying the camera, it usually has the lens cap on and even if it was off, I'm not sure light is going to ruin pixels.  The mirror being in the way of the sensor for dust is of less concern than something accidentally poking the sensor while the lens is off.  Dust tends to fall around the mirror anyway and the mirror just makes it harder to clean the sensor in the long run.  My main concern is if you change lenses in the field, a branch, screwdriver, etc. might accidentally scratch the exposed sensor. Mike  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						| 
							Seth
							
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #7 on: July 08, 2009, 06:37:22 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							When I'm carrying the camera, it usually has the lens cap on and even if it was off, I'm not sure light is going to ruin pixels.   What I meant is that focused beam on the sensor.  I have seen it burn through shutters in the "old days."  Dunno. The mirror being in the way of the sensor for dust is of less concern than something accidentally poking the sensor while the lens is off.  Dust tends to fall around the mirror anyway and the mirror just makes it harder to clean the sensor in the long run.   In PJ you just have no choice.  You're even supposed to urn the camera off when changing; we just don't can't do that in a fast moving situation.  I agree about the mirror, somewhat.  Of curse the D300 has a sensor clean (some kind of oscillation) but the D3 does not.  Go figure.  I have always wondered about those cleanings though.  Where the heck can the dust go except hang around to blow back on at some point !?!?!  It's not like they have a waste tank like printers do <GGGG>.  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
							 
							Seth <CWO4 (FMF) USN, Ret.> 
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
			
				
					
						
							Misirlou
							
								Newbie 
								 
								Posts: 4
								
								
								
								
								
							  
						 | 
						
							
								  | 
								
									
									 « Reply #8 on: July 14, 2009, 09:26:28 PM »  | 
								
								 | 
							  
							 
							The vibration cleaning systems work very well. I had to clean the sensor in my previous DSLR all the time, but my Canon 40D has only needed a wet cleaning once in 2 years. In the newer Canons, there's a patch of sticky material somewhere in the mirror chamber where the dust is supposed to accumulate after it falls off the sensor (off the anti-aliasing filter in front of the sensor, to be precise). I don't see the dust ever overwhelming that system.
  I'd like to see someone run a test on noise generated by these live-feed sensors. As long as the sensor is operating, it generates heat, which should produce more noise. I've seen people suggest anecdotally that the live view cameras spike up in noise quite a bit when live view is engaged for a long time, say 30 seconds or so. I haven't seen it in my DSLR yet, but I only use live view for focus confirmation and so forth. Full HD video has got to really put heat in a sensor. Maybe what's needed is an active cooling system, like the ones used on astro imaging equipment.
  I'm one of those guys who might have a real problem with the sun-on-the-sensor deal. I hardly ever use lens caps in potential shooting situations, preferring to leave lens hoods on all the time to protect the glass. I could easily imagine letting the sun accidentally fry whatever was at the focal plane. [Some years ago, I was shooting a snow scene on top of a mountain near Albuquerque with a Rolleiflex. I set up a scene with the sun visible. The air was very dry and cold. The sun beating down on the shutter blades caused them to warm up, and when I tripped the shutter, I got a blast of static electricity between shutter and film that ruined several frames. You can see from the negative that it started where the sun was in the frame.] A minor point to be sure, but it is something to consider.
  I'll be interested in where this idea goes. Something like a ruggedized G1 might be ideal for underwater photography. The water bath would draw heat away from the camera, eliminating sensor heat buildup. Contrast focus would probably be great in that situation too. You could switch on the LCD for easier viewing through a mask. Could be a real winner.
  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
								| 
								 | 
							 
								| 
								 | 
								
									 
									Logged
								 | 
							  
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	 |