Yep, same as the Tensor.  Mine doesn't have the cutesy handle on top but  I don't carry it.  I did glue an L shaped piece of plastic to the front so I can just pop it open with one hand.

GREAT little tool though, and I find it to be pretty spot on whether or not the paper has OBAs.

Hi Rhonda,
I hope you have some success 

I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm but I'm still thinking there's a monitor calibration issue here.
You said you are using and Epson printer with their inks(?) papers and profiles, and, presumably their recommended driver settings for the particular profile, which, I'm sure will not include colour density. I cannot believe that Epson would produce profiles that gave completely unsatisfactory results on any printer.

The problem then is how? The Huey will not allow you to set any known luminance values, it's all description with no numbers.
Again sorry to put a dampener on the Huey, but I looked up some comments on my local supplier's web site - they sell all types of calibration kit including the Huey.
"The Huey is a low cost monitor calibration solution and lacks the advanced features of the better systems."
"If you know what colour temperatures are, then you know a bit about colour management and we'd probably say Huey is not the right product for you as you don't get those choices in the software."
about the Pro version:
" ...does have some of the features that the basic Huey lacks, but it still lags behind the Spyder and EyeOne Display systems in terms of colour accuracy."

Your playing around with other settings at the weekend may produce better results but will you get consistent results over a range of images and papers?
The extra cost of a better calibration device would be well spent.
Whatever, have a good one 
Terry.

Hi Fred-

Actually it is an issue--both in QI and PS.  Using standard Epson profiles with their paper do the same to me (or did).  In QI I created a filter to add +1 Brightness, +3 Gamma and +3 Contrast that I applied before printing.  That was on a R2400.  Since creating my own profiles that has gone away.  Both in QI and PS.  

Linearizing the printers to factory settings with Colorbase 2 gives a better starting point for profiling.

As to monitor profiling, I don't know if you have a Spyder or Spyder2.  They should have quit saying that by now.  You're right.  I think it is a CRT carry over.

GMB/Xrite says you can do so if you want but suggests you just choose Native as the color temperature and proceed with calibrating.  I have tried both and find the Native gives the most accurate profile.  LCDs don't need all that crank up as you have stated.  The EyeOne sets my monitor brightness down from maximum.

Well guys, not to beat a dead horse here ...... but, I realize that my little Huey is not the first choice of professionals like yourselves.  I knew that when I purchased it, but did read several reviews and articles (one from PhotoShop) that lead me to believe that it would be an adequate system for me.  In my part time status, all I really need is to be able to print what I see on my monitor without making multiple sample prints at different lighting variations.  I do not print for other photographers, nor do I print Giclees for the original artist; either of these I realize would require exact color matching.  Don't misunderstand  - I do want and appreciate your advice, I just may not jump at some of the more expensive recommendations. 

Now, with that said; when I purchased my Epson V750 scanner the software package included a copy of X-rites EZ color calibration system (without the eye-one display tool).  Would this be worth the effort to install - or would it be no better than what I have already done?  From reading the product inserts, it refers to "Editing your printer profiles and applying them in Color Works"  This sounds to me very much like Howard was suggesting with the 'adjust density" option in the printer driver.

Thanks again, to all of you - I do appreciate and respect your input. :-\

Rhonda

cough ... I'm not  I assumed that as you were using a "pro" printer (= expensive), you were a pro and the small extra cost of a Spyder or an Eye One 2 would not be a problem. Sorry I misunderstood 
I would not think so. From what I can tell, it adjusts the density of ink applied via the driver - a sort of fine control of the paper type selection. I know that a profile can affect that but not in the direct way the "color density" adjustment does.

At first I couldn't see how X-rites EZ color software would be much use without the hardware. Also, I doubt if it will edit profiles that were not made with X-rite's hardware & software. However, I've just found the page that describes the software:
http://www.xrite.com/product_overview.aspx?ID=592
It's OEM only but does say So perhaps it is worth a go doing it visually
However doing it visually is just what Fred suggested regarding dark prints but still based on hardware (Huey) colour calibration 
Keep us posted on your progress 
Terry.

THANKS SO VERY MUCH!!  I will view the links you have posted, and go from there.

Rhonda 

We are talking monitor calibration only here, (that's all the Huey does) if you were asked to pay that price for an Eye One Display 2, they're having you on -  I know, it's the cost of the whole kit 
UK price for a basic Huey is about £59, the Eye One Display 2 is about £120. No doubt the real costs in the US will be less. My point was that the £60 (~$90) difference is small compared to the cost of a 4880 printer.
They do in Oz, called sales tax 

I agree, that Munki looks good, I have a friend who has one.
Terry.