Mike Chaney's Tech Corner
December 25, 2024, 05:24:21 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Qimage registration expired? New lifetime licenses are only $59.99!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Do the thumbnails rebuild differently in 2018?  (Read 18754 times)
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2017, 08:01:19 PM »

Thanks Mike,

I have never felt sure both my machines were running as fast as your system expects.

This is the flash screen,



When I was having troubles with overheating I started to look at this core temp prog. I wondered why I was seeing four cores and I was told that was normal as they were being treated as eight. Is this where the problem is?



Ony four cores?


I am out of my depth here. I do hope you can help, Mike.

Tony
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4229



Email
« Reply #16 on: July 04, 2017, 09:30:01 PM »

Most Intel i7 CPU's (except for super expensive ones near or over $1000) are 4 cores with hyper threading: hyper threading adds 4 more "logical" cores for a total of 8.  So you have 4 cores that can do just about anything they want at the same time, with 4 more that can do only certain (mostly integer) operations simultaneously.  The hyper threading (4 logical cores) add 15-30% performance in general (to the 4 "real" cores) so you end up with the performance equivalent of a system that has maybe 5 physical cores in the end.

The reason the operating system reports 8 cores (4 physical + 4 logical) is that they want software like QU to know that they should run 8 threads to get the most performance.  In the grand scheme of things, none of this should matter because the operating system should be able to handle 10, 20, 30, or more threads without you losing control or bogging down such that any one of those running threads won't run until you are down to 7 (or 3) so that one is freed up... but that's how your machine is acting.

As soon as you click the "Done" button on that refine window in your video, QU creates 7 threads to build the 7 raw thumbs and cache.  Fred has the same CPU as you and his behaves like mine, and all others I've seen: you get back to the main window and have control immediately.  I don't have a guess right now as to why yours is behaving like the whole machine is locked out until it gets down to only 3 threads remaining.

I would guess that your entire machine is locked down until the raw cache counter gets to 5/7.  To test that, try this: do the same thing you did in your video and while the QU screen is still unresponsive and showing that partial refine screen, try opening another program that isn't already open: like Chrome, FireFox, MS Word, or some other "small" program.  I bet they won't even open until QU gets to that 5/7 on the raw cache counter; in other words, QU is becoming responsive when the machine itself becomes responsive.

Mike
« Last Edit: July 04, 2017, 09:34:32 PM by admin » Logged
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #17 on: July 04, 2017, 10:18:22 PM »

I would guess that your entire machine is locked down until the raw cache counter gets to 5/7.  To test that, try this: do the same thing you did in your video and while the QU screen is still unresponsive and showing that partial refine screen, try opening another program that isn't already open: like Chrome, FireFox, MS Word, or some other "small" program.  I bet they won't even open until QU gets to that 5/7 on the raw cache counter; in other words, QU is becoming responsive when the machine itself becomes responsive.

I can open them - but I can't close them. I hit the close button and the screen does not clear back to QU.

Do have any suggestions as to how I can cure this?

Tony
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4229



Email
« Reply #18 on: July 04, 2017, 10:56:56 PM »

The rabbit hole goes deeper: that's even stranger.  Smiley  That's the same thing that is happening in QU for you: the refine window won't close.

Fred mentioned video card on the previous page.  I didn't think that could cause this but now I'm beginning to wonder.  Did you check for an update to your video card driver as he suggested?  Another thing I would suggest is temporarily disabling any anti-virus or anti-malware software you are running to see if that makes a difference.

Mike
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4229



Email
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2017, 12:29:00 AM »

Another thing you could try is cleaning out your thumbnail folder.  Use Utilities, Manage Thumbs and Raw Cache, and try deleting thumbs/cache older than 6 months. See if that helps.

Mike
Logged
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2017, 07:18:59 AM »

Thanks Mike.

I have tried all the things you mentioned.

I then re-installed QU17-121 and the problem went away.

I have to go out to take some photos but I'll try to make a video asap and you can see what happens.

Tony
Logged
Fred A
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 5644



WWW Email
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2017, 08:08:32 AM »

Quote
I then re-installed QU17-121 and the problem went away.

I have to go out to take some photos but I'll try to make a video asap and you can see what happens.

Tony

Wow, good report, but did you do the delete, anti virus, and video card update and reinstall, all at once?
Do you know what cured the problem?
... and 2018 is erratic??
Fred
« Last Edit: July 05, 2017, 08:49:42 AM by Fred A » Logged
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2017, 08:27:59 AM »

Yes it was going back to the old software that did it.

None of the other actions made any difference.

This is what the old software performs like.

http://www.tonygamble.uk/QimageThumbnails/20170705-082500_2_2.mp4


I have gone back to 18.103. Sometimes it works and sometimes it will not clear that refine screen. With the old 17 software it works without a delay every time. There is a difference. I'll stay with v17 until we work out what the difference is.

I think 18.103 worked for the first time I reverted from v17 - but then became slow. I need more time to confirm this but need to go out now. I'll experiment again later.

Tony


« Last Edit: July 05, 2017, 08:48:58 AM by Fred A » Logged
Fred A
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 5644



WWW Email
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2017, 08:48:22 AM »

Quote
I have gone back to 18.103. Sometimes it works and sometimes it will not clear that refine screen. With the old 17 software it works without a delay every time. There is a difference. I'll stay with v17 until we work out what the difference is.
I really don't think Mike made any changes to eh rebuild with threads, but we have to wait for him.

I was so happy that it worked for you that I didn't see the 2017 reinstall number until after I posted.
Fred
Logged
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2017, 09:52:23 AM »

I think 18.103 worked for the first time I reverted from v17 - but then became slow. I need more time to confirm this but need to go out now. I'll experiment again later.

No. It was either luck or bad memory on my part. I have reverted  from v2017 to the latest v2018 and even the first multiple RAW refine was hopelessly slow

2017 does all I need as most of the variations in 2018 are to do with printing. Yes, I use QU for printing but its main use for me is converting RAW files.

Nevertheless I will be fascinated to hear what Mike says he introduced that may be causing my malfunction.

Tony

Logged
Fred A
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 5644



WWW Email
« Reply #25 on: July 05, 2017, 09:57:34 AM »

Quote
Nevertheless I will be fascinated to hear what Mike says he introduced that may be causing my malfunction.

I too, would love the explanation especially when your system is the only reported instance of a locked Qimage until the threads are released.
That's what makes the tracking down so difficult.  We cannot repeat what you get.

Fred
Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4229



Email
« Reply #26 on: July 05, 2017, 01:24:08 PM »

Yes it was going back to the old software that did it.

None of the other actions made any difference.

This is what the old software performs like.

http://www.tonygamble.uk/QimageThumbnails/20170705-082500_2_2.mp4


I have gone back to 18.103. Sometimes it works and sometimes it will not clear that refine screen. With the old 17 software it works without a delay every time. There is a difference. I'll stay with v17 until we work out what the difference is.

I think 18.103 worked for the first time I reverted from v17 - but then became slow. I need more time to confirm this but need to go out now. I'll experiment again later.

Tony




Is there a reason that, in the old version, you only selected the left two columns of thumbnails: such that when the refine screen appears, there would be no thumbs selected under the refine window?  Since part of the problem is that the refine window doesn't close, what happens when you select the entire top row of thumbs and repeat the multi-refine in the old version with an entire row of thumbs selected: can you post a video of that?

Mike
Logged
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #27 on: July 05, 2017, 01:55:29 PM »

No real reason, Mike. Just wanting to ring the changes.

I have now selected the top two lines of thumbnails.

In 217 http://www.tonygamble.uk/QimageThumbnails/20170705-143745_1_3.mp4

In 218 http://www.tonygamble.uk/QimageThumbnails/20170705-144011_1_3.mp4

I think that second one runs for about two minutes 45 secs before the panel becomes usable again.

Tony


Logged
admin
Administrator
Forum Superhero
*****
Posts: 4229



Email
« Reply #28 on: July 05, 2017, 02:19:53 PM »

That helps, thanks.  In this one, it is more apparent that it is building the thumbnails that happen to be under the refine window (in the foreground) before giving control back.  That could be timing (video card/CPU) related.  With that in mind, I just emailed you a link to a beta that may fix the problem.  Could you give that a try and reply here as to whether the beta fixes the problem?

Thanks,
Mike
Logged
tonygamble
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 373


Email
« Reply #29 on: July 05, 2017, 02:38:31 PM »

The beta works fine, Mike.

Well done.

I have only tried it on one PC but the two machines are as near identical as possible. I'll test the other later today.

EDIT.   Works fine on the second PC.

Many thanks.

Tony
« Last Edit: July 05, 2017, 04:10:15 PM by tonygamble » Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Security updates 2022 by ddisoftware, Inc.