You told us a little about your monitor's calibration but nothing about the printer: your monitor's calibration has no effect on printing.  What printer are you using?  What paper?  What printer profile are you using?  Where did the images come from (the ones you are printing) and what type of images are they (TIFF, JPEG, raw, etc.)

P.S.  Qimage, Photoshop, Lightroom, and all software that is color managed will print identical color IF you have the programs set up the same way.  If you see a difference between PSE and QU, there is a difference in either the software settings or the driver settings.  There's an article right here on this forum about that.  It's over a decade old but still applies:

https://ddisoftware.com/tech/articles/may-2011-printing-the-same-colors-in-qimage-ultimate-and-photoshop/

Regards,
Mike

Based on your reply, I have some things to suggest.  First, I would suggest not playing with the rendering intents: set everything to Relative Colorimetric with Black Point Compensation turned on.  That will produce the most accurate color.  If you start mixing and comparing absolute and saturation, it will just complicate things and those are generally not to be used with photos anyway.

Next, in Qimage make sure you drop down Printer Profile on the main window and select "Suggest printer profiles...".  The profile for "Canon Pro-200 Photo Paper Pro Luster" will likely be the top selection in the list: just verify that and double click that profile to select it, in the next window verify Relative Colorimetric and Black Point Compensation on, and click "OK".  This will allow Qimage to do the color management using the proper profile: you don't want the driver doing that.

Finally, be sure to let your eyes adjust to the white of the paper and the white of the screen.  You can never hold a print up to the screen and get the exact same white balance because papers have optical brighteners that make the white of the paper "blue" in comparison to many surroundings.  Each has to be viewed within the realm of their own whitepoint: screen vs paper.

Regards,
Mike

Hello, I've using QU for years with a calibrated Eizo monitor and mostly custom printer profiles for a range of Epson and Ilford papers. Monitor and prints match very well.
I'll just say this, the monitor should match the print, not the other way round when using full colour managed printing. I've hardly ever had an issue with colour matching, all I've done is adusted the MONITOR brightness to match the test print and then re-calibrated the monitor. I use 6500k for the monitor.

Have you checked the printer for blocked nozzles? If OK then it seems the paper profile is not good. Try some fresh paper of a different brand, eg Espson if an Epson printer. Also us some standard test images.
I hope this helps in some way.

Terry

Terry is right: we match the monitor to the print.  But to do that, we have to have a good test print and we need to print with OEM ink on OEM paper using an OEM profile.  That's the best way to not get lost in the rabbit hole.

Which reminds me.  No one asked, but I hope you are not using third party inks and you are using genuine Canon inks.  All of this goes out the window if you are using third party inks and you need a good printer profiling tool to create your own profiles if you are.

This is a test image that is freely available in many places online.  Many people use this as a test:

https://www.ddisoftware.com/misc/PrinterEvaluationImage_V002_ProPhoto.tif

The task here is to print the above test image:

(1) Select your Canon Pro-200 and select a Canon media type that you have on hand.  Let's say Canon Pro Luster.
(2) Drop down Printer Profile and select "Suggest printer profiles" and select and open the Pro-200 Pro Luster profile (should be the first or second one on the list).
(3) Once the profile is selected, make sure the settings are Relative Colorimetric, BPC on, and click "OK".
(4) Add the above test image and print.

Provided the printer is in good working order, you are using OEM inks, and you haven't turned Driver AI off in Qimage, you should get a good test print.  If it doesn't match the monitor, the monitor needs to be adjusted.

Regards,
Mike

That's the same test image I use. Once you have the printing sorted out, work on the monitor, not the other way 'round. Qimage is really good at preventing double profiling and other weirdness. The other day I changed papers and got the setup wrong. Qimage instantly recognized the problem and applied the necessary fixes. I wouldn't have noticed otherwise until I wasted paper.

Yes that is right but monitor calibration in my experience does not set brightness. If too bright, colours will look washed out.

I'm in the UK. I used a local small company but there other national ones around who do it. I've always found custom profiles are better than those provided by paper and printer manufacturers. That was some time ago so they may have improved.
Terry

It's not typically a big deal.  You profile your monitor and if the monitor looks brighter than your print, you turn down the monitor brightness and reprofile at the new (lower) brightness until you get the overall brightness to match the print.  You shouldn't have to do any more than that.  The reason we adjust the monitor to match the print is that your monitor supplies its own light and can adjust brightness, color temperature, etc.  With prints you are limited to your viewing environment since prints are illuminated from an external light source that you have limited control over.

But given that your eyes will adjust to any color temperature light, you really only need to profile the monitor and printer and then it is often necessary to turn down the brightness of the monitor and reprofile until it matches the "brightness" of the print in your lighting.  Brightness is a hard thing to get right even for monitor profiling tools because it depends on ambient lighting which can be affected by time of day and even monitor viewing angle and positioning of the ambient light and how it hits the screen.

Mike